The Pro-Choice Public Education Project http://protectchoice.org/ The Pro-Choice Public Education Project has tools, information, and resources about reproductive health, rights and justice for young women and the organizations that serve them. http://protectchoice.org/article.php?id=115 Download all the Court Case graphics <div class="text blurb">If you'd like to download all of the Court Case graphics, they're all collected in this section.</div> Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:43:16 -0700 http://protectchoice.org/article.php?id=115 http://protectchoice.org/article.php?id=112 Gonzales v. Carhart <div class="text blurb">In 2003, President Bush signed a federal abortion ban into law. Planned Parenthood, the Center for Reproductive Rights, the National Abortion Federation and the American Civil Liberties Union challenged it in federal district courts around the country. </div> Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:43:16 -0700 http://protectchoice.org/article.php?id=112 http://protectchoice.org/article.php?id=111 Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England <div class="text blurb">Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, along with several other women Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:43:16 -0700 http://protectchoice.org/article.php?id=111 http://protectchoice.org/article.php?id=110 Stenberg v. Carhart <div class="text blurb">Dr. Carhart stated that the Nebraska law banning so-called Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:43:16 -0700 http://protectchoice.org/article.php?id=110 http://protectchoice.org/article.php?id=109 Now v. Scheidler <div class="text blurb">NOW wanted monetary compensation and laws to protect abortion clinics from violence. They referred to the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act and the Hobbs Act, both meant to protect citizens from extortion and violent interference with their businesses</div> Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:43:16 -0700 http://protectchoice.org/article.php?id=109 http://protectchoice.org/article.php?id=108 Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey <div class="text blurb">Planned Parenthood challenged sections of the state Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:43:16 -0700 http://protectchoice.org/article.php?id=108 http://protectchoice.org/article.php?id=107 Rust v. Sullivan <div class="text blurb"> Rust and several family planning providers challenged President Ronald Reagan Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:43:16 -0700 http://protectchoice.org/article.php?id=107 http://protectchoice.org/article.php?id=106 Hodgson v. Minnesota <div class="text blurb">Dr. Hodgson challenged a Minnesota state law that required a minor to notify both biological parents before having an abortion.It made no exception for parents who were divorced, who had not married, or who were unknown to their daughters.</div> Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:43:16 -0700 http://protectchoice.org/article.php?id=106 http://protectchoice.org/article.php?id=105 Webster v. Reproductive Health Services <div class="text blurb">Reproductive health professionals challenged a state law that included harsh restrictions on reproductive services. The law forbade the use of public facilities for all abortions except those necessary to save a woman's life and required physicians to perform tests to determine the viability of fetuses after 20 weeks of pregnancy.</div> Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:43:16 -0700 http://protectchoice.org/article.php?id=105 http://protectchoice.org/article.php?id=104 Bowen v. Kendrick <div class="text blurb">Kendrick and his group challenged on the fairness of the Adolescent Family Life Act. This act authorized the use of federal money to teach abstinence-only sex education to teenagers. It also allowed federal money to go to religious organizations. </div> Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:43:16 -0700 http://protectchoice.org/article.php?id=104 http://protectchoice.org/article.php?id=103 Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists <div class="text blurb">The American College of Ob-Gyns brought this case against Governor Thornburgh stating that Pennsylvania Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:43:16 -0700 http://protectchoice.org/article.php?id=103 http://protectchoice.org/article.php?id=102 City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health <div class="text blurb">The Akron Center for RHS challenged sections of an ordinance restricting abortion, which: required minors under 15 to obtain parental or judicial consent for an abortion; required physicians to give women information designed to dissuade them from having abortions; imposed a 24-hour waiting period after the signing of the consent form; and required that all second-trimester abortions be performed in a hospital. </div> Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:43:16 -0700 http://protectchoice.org/article.php?id=102 http://protectchoice.org/article.php?id=101 Harris v. McRae <div class="text blurb">McRae challenged the Hyde Amendment of 1976, which prohibits the federal Medicaid funding of abortions not necessary to preserve the woman Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:43:16 -0700 http://protectchoice.org/article.php?id=101 http://protectchoice.org/article.php?id=100 Bellotti v. Baird <div class="text blurb">Baird challenged a statute requiring women under 18 to obtain parental or judicial consent before having an abortion. </div> Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:43:16 -0700 http://protectchoice.org/article.php?id=100 http://protectchoice.org/article.php?id=99 Maher v. Roe <div class="text blurb">Several low-income women challenged a Connecticut state regulation that banned public funding for abortions that were not Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:43:16 -0700 http://protectchoice.org/article.php?id=99